Register

To become a member of ITProPortal Register here.

Already a member? Login here

Please register below. All we need is a valid email address and a password.

Please use a real email address as we need to email you to confirm your account.
Must be at least 6 characters long.

Benefits of joining ITProPortal:

  • Unlimited Access to Special Reports and White Papers
  • Exclusive offers and discounts
  • Free entry to all competitions
  • Access to beta sections of ITProPortal.com

Login to your account



Forgot your password?


Lawsuit over Virgin Mobile's use of Flickr girl blames Creative Commons

Lawsuit over Virgin Mobile's use of Flickr girl blames Creative Commons
  • Digg del.icio.us reddit Facebook

Flickr directs users to the website of Creative Commons Corporation to find out about the meaning of the different licences. Wong chose an Attribution Licence, which the Creative Commons website explains, will let others copy, distribute and display your photo and derivative works based upon it, provided they give credit the way you request.

The lawsuit says that Virgin failed to credit Wong in the ads and therefore breached the licence terms. More controversially, Wong blames the Creative Commons Corporation for failing "to adequately educate and warn him, as a user of the Creative Commons Attribution licence, of the meaning of commercial use and the ramifications and effects of entering into a licence allowing such."

A "Noncommercial" licence is also offered by Creative Commons and that option is also available to Flickr users.

According to the lawsuit, Virgin Mobile's campaign features over 100 images downloaded from Yahoo's photo-sharing website Flickr. But Alison was the only minor, which immediately incited the attention of news stations, bloggers and legal commentators, it claims.

"The photos are displayed on billboards, newspaper ads and Virgin's website accompanied by trenchant, and often disparaging, slogans that expand upon the underlying image," it says. "What distinguishes this campaign from most if not all others, is the fact that the images are being used under the Creative Commons 'Attribution' licences without the knowledge or consent of the persons depicted in the photos."

The lawsuit adds: "In a matter of months, Alison was transformed from a normal high school student to the 'dump your pen friend girl' whose name generates over a hundred responsive links on Google."

"Although Alison,  like most teenage girls her age, tried at all costs to avoid humiliating and embarrassing situations, because of Virgin Mobile's opportunistic conduct, she now faces them every day," it says.

Virgin Mobile is being sued for invasion of privacy because it "implicitly represented to the public that Alison consented to the use of her likeness to endorse Virgin Mobile's products, when, in fact, she had no knowledge that her image was being used," according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for Alison Chang and Justin Wong.

Team Outlaw

Posted by Team Outlaw on 26 Sept. 2007

This article was contributed by OUT-LAW.COM, part of international law firm Pinsent Masons. See http://www.out-law.com for further details.

Tags: Digital Media, Digital Rights Management, Legal issues, Personal Privacy